Influencing and Disagreement

So what do we do when our friends or loved ones believe something we ‘know’ is absolute rubbish. Or act in a way that is difficult for us; based on one of their beliefs. It may even be a belief about us.

If we’ve decided to try and influence this person’s beliefs, we should examine our own motives first. Why do we want to influence their beliefs? Is it because we believe they could negatively impact their own (or someone else’s) health, happiness or general welfare? Or is it more about how we feel? How the other person’s beliefs impact us? (Just asking…..) If it’s more about our own feelings, exploring why it’s important to us may be more important than influencing someone else? If it’s not that important, let it alone. Remember, there is always the option to try and understand the other person’s point of view (it might even make sense to us), or simply to agree to differ.

Finally is the argument worth the risk? And there are real risks involved. Besides the potential strain on the relationship with this person. If we don’t proceed with respect and thoughtfulness we may lose the relationship permanently.

Second, don’t try and tell someone they’re wrong. All that will achieve is an argument. Honestly, why have an argument if we don’t have to? Maybe we enjoy arguing. Some do.

If satisfied our motives are pure, the discussion is worth having and the risks worth taking. What is the next step?

There are several things to consider.

  1. Listen first. Be respectful and empathetic to them, as a person, and to their point of view.
  2. In the same way we deliver an assertiveness message, remember it’s the subject we’re talking about, not them as a person. So always talk about the issue and don’t insert personal insults!
  3. Start by exploring why they think this belief is important; what they get out of this belief, ie how does it contribute to their life? (often the reasons underlying a belief system is like unwrapping layers of a personality and the reasons for why we think and act as we do are part of the complex whole of personality, experience and environment) Be careful! The beliefs this person owns may be supporting their daily functioning.
  4. Consider if there’s a story we can tell them about others who have benefited from the point of view we wish them to consider eg someone whose life was altered/ saved/improved because of their beliefs on this issue?
  5. Think of ways to encourage them to challenge their beliefs, ie question the source of their information, explore contrary information sources and whether they are credible or not.
  6. Finally there is the option to confront them about how their beliefs are affecting us.What do we do if this person regularly brings up their beliefs, tries to ‘educate’ or alter our own beliefs or just wants to talk about an issue that’s important to them but annoying to us? We have a number of options. We can:
    • Avoid them
    • Explain that we don’t hold the same beliefs and would rather not discuss it further
    • Suggest we compare data and respect each other’s findings/research
    • Agree that this is a topic we can’t talk about

There are a number of well known topics that lead to arguments and ill feeling. Chief amongst these are those based on belief and emotions, such as religion and politics. It seems we can add many of the aspects of dealing with a pandemic to this list and that health issues tap into our feelings in a similar way to both politics and belief systems. Maybe because they all impact on life and death issues. To me the arguments and passion arising from a pandemic have aspects of a religious war. No-one is convincing anyone to change their beliefs. Instead people are locked in an attitudinal war to the death, with no quarter taken or given.

But what if their beliefs are about us and have led to a split in the family / friendship group? (This often happens after a relationship breakup, where there may be an expectation that friends will ‘take sides’) How can we address the beliefs of someone who has already decided that we are ‘the problem’?

I believe it is still very much in the same way as any other belief we wish to challenge. By being open to their view, listening and exploring its parameters with the person whose beliefs they are. The hardest thing to do is working out when and how to approach this person for such a discussion. And being prepared for a lot of negativity about ourselves.

Alison

Influencing and Disagreement


So what do you do when your friends or loved ones believe something you ‘know’ is absolute rubbish. If you’ve decided to try and influence this person’s beliefs, you should examine your own motives first. Why do you want to influence their beliefs? Is it because you believe they could negatively impact their own (or someone else’s) health, happiness or general welfare? Or is it more about how you’re feeling? How the other person’s beliefs impact you? (Just asking…..) If it’s more about your own feelings, exploring why it’s important to you may be more important than influencing someone else? If it’s not that important, let it alone. Remember, there is always the option to try and understand the other person’s point of view (it might even make sense to you), or simply to agree to differ.

Second, don’t try and tell someone they’re wrong. All that will get you is an argument. Honestly, why have an argument if you don’t have to? Maybe you enjoy arguing. Some do.

Finally is the argument worth the risk? And there are real risks involved. Besides the potential strain on your relationship with this person. If you don’t proceed with respect and thoughtfulness you may lose the relationship permanently.

If you are satisfied your motives are pure, the argument is worth having and the risks worth taking. What is your next step?

There are several things to consider.

  1. Listen first. Be respectful and empathetic to them, as a person, and to their point of view.
  2. In the same way you deliver an assertiveness message, remember it’s the subject you’re talking about, not them as a person. So always talk about the issue and don’t insert personal insults!
  3. Start by exploring why they think this belief is important; what they get out of this belief, ie how does it contribute to their life? (often the reasons underlying a belief system is like unwrapping layers of a personality and the reasons for why we think and act as we do are part of the complex whole of personality, experience and environment) Be careful! The beliefs this person owns may be supporting their daily functioning.
  4. Consider if there’s a story you can tell them about others who have benefited from the point of view you wish them to consider eg someone whose life was altered/ saved/improved because of their beliefs on this issue?
  5. Think of ways to encourage them to challenge their beliefs, ie question the source of their information, explore contrary information sources and whether they are credible or not.

6. Finally there is the option to confront them about how their beliefs are affecting you. What do we do if this person regularly brings up their beliefs, tries to ‘educate’ or alter our own beliefs or just wants to talk about an issue that’s important to them but annoying to us? We have a number of options. We can:

  • Avoid them
  • Explain that we don’t hold the same beliefs and would rather not discuss it further
  • Suggest we compare data and respect each other’s findings/research
  • Agree that this is a topic we can’t talk about

There are a number of well known topics that lead to arguments and ill feeling. Chief amongst these are those based on belief and emotions, such as religion and politics. It seems we can add many of the aspects of dealing with a pandemic to this list and that health issues tap into our feelings in a similar way to both politics and belief systems. Maybe because they all impact on life and death issues. To me the arguments and passion arising from this pandemic have aspects of a religious war. No-one is convincing anyone to change their beliefs. Instead people are locked in an attitudinal war to the death, with no quarter taken or given.

Alison

Not One of Us – Conflict, Hate & Sociopathic Behaviour

Let me begin by talking about sociopathic behaviour.  Dictionary.com describes a sociopath as ‘Someone whose social behavior is extremely abnormal. Sociopaths are interested only in their personal needs and desires, without concern for the effects of their behavior on others.’  I  believe a sociopath doesn’t see others as real people.  Other people are seen as objects that should respond to the sociopath’s wishes in much the same way a doll would.  (It could be argued the sociopath sees themselves as a ‘God’ in a world where there are few, if any, other Gods.) Similarly, we can behave like sociopaths when we become angry with those we  neither know nor wish to understand.  Distance allows us to hate without understanding, in ways we would never consider face to face.  Whilst understanding allows us to let go of hate.  For example  it is easy to hate another driver who gets in our way.  After all, they are only a car to us, not a real person.  In the same way, online ‘trolls’ will readily insult, degrade and threaten those they neither know nor wish to understand, because they aren’t real people to the ‘trolls’.

Historically conflict has been stoked by the concept of otherness.  People are ‘other’ if they are not part of my family, my village, my country, my race, my culture, my faith.  Once defined as ‘other’ we tend to project imagined traits onto these unknown people.  If they are ‘heroes’ or famous for some kind of success, we may project good traits.  If they are people we see as a competitor or a problem of some kind, these imagined traits are likely to be negative.  Surely the ultimate consequence of such a lack of understanding is the kind of misinformed fear that drives violence, oppression and war.

Ultimately this kind of misinformed negativity hurts us as much as it does those we aim our negativity towards. 

I have a close friend who, raised in Canada, expected motorists to respond in the way she was used to at home, ie with help and kindness, when her car broke down.  However, what she got was only anger from frustrated motorists. Let me set the scene for you.  Back in the mists of time Camberwell Junction was an ‘uncontrolled’ intersection of 3 major roads in a thriving shopping centre, in urban Melbourne.  By ‘uncontrolled’ I mean this intersection had no traffic lights or any other means of regulating the traffic flow.  Adding to the chaos, all roads carried trams as well as the usual road traffic and pedestrians.  My friend’s car was quite old, so when it stopped working in the middle of this intersection traffic was blocked along several major thoroughfares.

Not knowing what else to do (and remembering this is years before mobile phones) she locked the car and looked for a public phone to call assistance.  Really what else could she do?  On her return she found the, nearly 30 minute wait had made everyone much more helpful. Honestly, in what way did they think expressing anger, towards someone already dealing with the problem of a car that has broken down, helped the situation?

Mindful of these stories, when my own, aged car stalled on a busy road and I knew it wouldn’t start (as the battery was flat) I wanted to avoid further problems.  Exiting the vehicle, I tapped on the driver’s window, of the car behind me, and apologising for the fact my car wouldn’t start, suggested they go around my car.  By making this gesture I called attention to my trouble.  The result was a number of young men arriving, pushing my car off the road and jump starting it.  I expect it helped that I was 21 at the time.  The moral is that personalising the situation led to a quick solution, that was far less stressful for all concerned.

My point is that if we approach people with a reasonable and open attitude things are more likely to turn out well for all concerned.  That criticising and being negative about others is one option, but engaging with all this negativity helps no-one and generally makes our own lives poorer.  It’s  important to consider others as deserving of as much right to respect as we would want for ourselves (and a chance to explain themselves if necessary).  Hating often hurts us more than those we hate.  It closes our minds and causes us unnecessary suffering.  Meanwhile, the person we hate may be totally unaffected by our feelings, or unnecessarily hurt.   (I once worked with someone who seemed to dislike me on sight.  All I could do was avoid them and be polite.  I thought it would be a nightmare when we were both chosen to work in a small team on a project that would last some months.  The surprising result was an apology – for the undeserved judgement – and a friendship.)

Let’s look to our similarities and try to understand our differences.  Generally we have far more in common than otherwise.  Everyone I’ve met wants very much the same things from life; friends and family that we live in mutual care with, good health and a world that we can enjoy.  Let’s enjoy it together.

Alison

Gender Issues – Looks, Love and Public Judgement

As well as my belief that the judgement implied by gender terms should be removed as much as possible (* see my post ‘A Question of Pronouns’), I would like to address similar gender issues around how we are publicly judged.

I don’t understand why it matters (except to those directly involved):

  • How we dress or decorate ourselves, as long as it’s appropriate to the occasion
  • Who we’re sexually interactive with, as long as we consider their needs as well as our own
  • Who we love, as long as we are respectful of the individual/s involved
  • If we change all of the above on an hourly, daily, weekly, yearly or random basis

I believe we shouldn’t be so quick to label each other. So quick to believe that once labelled, we have to act according to that label. So quick to believe we should live with the same label all our lives.

GENDER TERMS - SCOTS

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we could live in a world that allowed us to alter how we present ourselves whenever we wished? A world that didn’t judge us if we love different genders, ages, ethnicities, etc at different times in our lives. That didn’t judge us if we wish to dress as female or male (or any other version within or outside either extreme) just because we felt like it that day. Similarly we could be attracted to, and have loving relationships with, someone because of the person they are irrespective of their appearance or gender.

(Of course it would also mean we would have to be kinder to those who flirt with us that we aren’t attracted to.   If the signals we send out are harder to read, we can expect others to get them wrong more often.)

It is my belief that less of us would feel lost and alone in a world that didn’t accept us as we are. That less of us would feel the need to surgically alter our bodies so we can feel we fit better into our world. That more people would feel they have a legitimate place in society.

GENDER TERMS - PENGUIN.jpg

 

Alison

New Year – Achievements & Resolutions

NEW YEAR RESOLUTIONS - Forgotten to have a life

As the New Year approached many of us sat down to plan, or rushed into plans about how to live our lives in the next year. But what we often fail to do is review the things we’ve achieved in the year that’s ending. It’s all part of our tendency to dwell on the negative and largely ignore the good things in our lives. As a result we may end the old and start the new year with a sense of failure and inadequacy. Instead, what if we started the new year with a sense of achievement, feelings of self worth and a firm base on which to build further achievements?

NEW YEAR RESOLUTIONS - Recycled

If you find it hard to identify your achievements from the past year, let me give you some ideas. What have you done in the last year that:

  • Improved your own life?
    • Increased your skills
    • Improved your health
    • Improved your financial situation
    • Improved your living situation
    • Improved your attitude to others / life / work / bills / the unavoidable tasks in life
    • Finished off a task already started or you’d been putting off
    • Added to your joy in life
  • Helped others? – including improving the material, emotional, psychological or lifestyle experience / resilience of:
    • partner
    • children
    • other relations
    • friends
    • animals
    • society at large
    • the environment

None of these achievement have to be world shattering. Our achievements can be as simple as a day trip to the beach, taking in the mail for a neighbour, or giving to a charity ……… as long as they count for us.

 

Alison

NEW YEAR RESOLUTIONS - Good Dog

Christmas Gift Giving

We’ve just lived through another season of shopping for others. A season where we pore over lists full of the names of people for whom we must find one or more gifts. Gifts which we buy to show how we value them, our love, appreciation…… (insert the appropriate emotion.) But what lies beneath all the frantic shopping? What are we really trying to achieve with our gifts and what are we hoping to receive in return? And why do we find some gifts so disappointing?

CHRISTMAS GIFTS - The system

So I have been thinking about a way to make this seasonal process more meaningful, useful and hopefully more enjoyable for everyone.

What I want from the gift giving process is to feel understood and appreciated by those I have a real connection with. I want to give others something that will similarly please them. Something that will increase their happiness, even if only momentarily. I believe most of us feel the same. But how do we achieve this result?

Our family go through the seasonal ritual of searching for gift inspiration, asking each other what we would like to receive and often buying too many things (because we really don’t feel sure we’ve hit the mark yet). To make matters even more complicated most of us already have more things than we really need (look at all the shows and books etc about people overwhelmed by the amount of stuff they own and the opposing movement towards minimalist lifestyles.) The gift giving ritual often concludes with our trying to deceive the giver into believing we wanted and/or liked the gift received far more than we really did. Frankly I find this last part the most stressful and unnecessary of all. Increasingly I find myself getting more enjoyment from gift finding and giving than the receiving.

CHRISTMAS GIFTS - Returns.jpg

A common alternative is to give gift vouchers or actual cash. There are several problems with the above alternatives for me. Firstly, it puts a dollar amount on our value of this person. How we assign this value being based on a series of complex interactions between factors such as our own resources; our perception of the receivers need and/or how it will impact how they regard us; what we see as appropriate to the nature of the relationship and/or what we can expect from them in return.   Secondly, I really I don’t want to put a dollar value on people and my relationships with them. Finally, I don’t see the point of giving vouchers or cash backwards and forwards between family and friends. (Of course all of this discussion doesn’t apply to children and those who live with incomes that are too low to allow them common luxuries. I believe we should expect less from them and give more.)

CHRISTMAS GIFTS - VOUCHERS & JUNK.jpg

There’s a saying ‘it’s the thought that counts’. I take this to mean the thought that went into finding, making or selecting an appropriate gift. Of selecting gifts that show how well the giver knows us and what they think of us.

But what if we thought more laterally around the concept of gifts. What if we thought about how to show gifts for these people all year, not just at Christmas, birthdays or similar occasions, and planned ahead. If we see an appropriate gift we could get it for them when we see it, put their name on it and put it away (maybe write an electronic reminder that will pop up at Christmas, eg. ‘umbrella for mum, stored in bedroom cupboard’) Also, we could think beyond buying new things. Second hand items are called antiques or vintage when they are valued. We could be brave enough to give and receive things second hand items, as long as they’re in good condition, fit for purpose and of value to the receiver.

CHRISTMAS GIFTS - Scientific equation.jpg

Finally, we could consider giving experiences. There are experiences that can be bought like theatre tickets, skydiving lessons, the hire of a status symbol car for a few hours. But there are also experiences we can’t buy as such. Experiences like helping an elderly relative in their garden; taking someone younger to an experience they wouldn’t be allowed to attend without an older person (like Melbourne’s ‘White Nights’)or a show; or planning and organising a gathering with their friends, so the receiver can enjoy the event without the stress. (I recently realised that since becoming an adult I had only had one party, that celebrated me, that I didn’t plan and organise myself.)

Maybe we could really think about what would show how we truly feel about each individual before committing to whatever ‘gift’ we decide to give them.

 

Alison

 

 

Embarrassed

I was running to stop my supermarket trolley from colliding with a parked car when I tripped and fell. Hard. Flat out. On concrete. A woman passing with her grandchild hurried over to help. It was very nice of her, but I wished she wasn’t there. I wished that no one had witnessed my embarrassment. Later I felt pleased that I hadn’t hurt myself much, nothing broken (which at my age is an issue) but at the time my overwhelming response was embarrassment!

I’m not alone in feeling this way either. Most people feel embarrassed when they fall and hurt themselves. And I really wonder why this is so!

Why do we feel both responsible and ashamed when we fall? Falling is an accident. Falling is not something that shows we’re stupid, clumsy, incompetent…… It may even be a sign of illness or diminished capacity requiring assistance. This must be a social issue, however small an issue it is. But perhaps it’s part of a larger issue.

Small acts of failure like missing a train stop, spilling a drink or dropping food on our clothes are surely of a similar level of incompetence to falling. Yet the former earn a much lower level of shame than the latter. Maybe it is the link with a fall being something laughable, a comedy act where we are encouraged to laugh at those who fall. Or is it the reminder of babyhood and those first steps, do we feel reduced to a stumbling infant? Or do we feel that we have entered some level of physical decline where we could be seen as less than a functioning adult? Is falling seen as a sign of weakness, in the same way that public crying has traditionally been?

FALLING - CARTOONIST

Or is it a simple childhood response at the heart of our embarrassment? We happily watch others getting negative attention as children, glad it isn’t us, and so we learn to collude to shame or embarrass those who are being shamed. Our adult shame from falling may easily stem from this childhood experience.

Whatever the reason, shame is a common response to a fall. Maybe it would help if we laughed at our own perceived stupidity, or maybe we could simply accept that we had an accident. Accept that the fall may not have been the result of a fault in our own behaviour. Accept that we have fallen, but instead of feeling embarrassment, we could expect the world to treat us with sympathy and comfort our hurts.

 

Alison

 FALLING - MEL BROOKS - HUMOUR

TRAGEDY IS WHEN I CUT MY FINGER; COMEDY IS WHEN YOU FALL INTO AN OPEN SEWER AND DIE – MEL BROOKS

What’s so funny about this? Not much, but it is an excellent comment on human nature. It also shows how relative comedy is and how subjective. In other words it all depends on situations and the relationship you have with the people involved in them. Clearly one person’s tragedy can be another person’s comedy and vice versa. Mel Brooks is actually being brutally honest here. If I cut my finger, I’m not laughing. It can really hurt, bleed a lot, require stiches, get infected, might have to be amputated, lead to death if untreated. None these things are funny to me; they are terrible and can absolutely be tragic. BUT if you are in the room with me when I initially cut my finger or if you see it happen on a you tube video, say, and I happened to do it in a very clumsy way, you might crack up, reblog the video and it could go viral and appear on the TV show, “The World’s Funniest Videos.” On the other hand, let’s say I’m watching that particular show and some guys is zooming down the street on his motorcycle and doesn’t notice the open manhole cover leading to a sewer. As a result of the same kind of carelessness that caused me to cut my finger, this guy falls headfirst into the manhole, followed by his bike, as we see in the photo accompanying this audioboo. I might just laugh like hell at the poor schmuck. Even if I learn the guy has died, I might feel guilty for having laughed but, unchecked, I will laugh at the situation, a) because I find it funny and b) because I’m relieved that it wasn’t me. As long as people don’t know the cyclist, they will laugh. And that’s exactly the point Mel Brooks is making. And THAT’s what’s so funny! (https://audioboom.com/posts/1821312-you-think-that-s-funny)

 

“We Were on a Break”

A book has recently been published called ‘The Break’ (author: Marian Keyes).  It’s “about a man who asks his wife for six months off “for good behaviour” to do all the things he missed out on by being married.” (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/life/weekend-australian-magazine/marian-keyes-is-a-midlife-marriage-sabbatical-really-a-good-idea/news-story/ddd56d53b109ae3e41d5e3953dbab930) All responsibilities and commitments to the marriage being suspended for the length of the break. It’s sparked conversations about who would agree to such a thing and what the implications are. But most importantly how would each of us react in this situation. Even the author of the movie’s story, when asked, said she didn’t know how she would react and what she would be prepared to agree to.

I know how I would feel. Either you’re in this relationship or you’re out.

You cannot suspend a relationship and expect it to stand still whilst you’re away from it. A relationship isn’t like a parked car. A relationship is a complex series of interconnected behaviours that take time and commitment to build and delineate. What’s more a relationship isn’t static. You can’t build a relationship and expect it to stay frozen in time.

Below: Ross and Rachel (of the TV series ‘Friends’) and their ongoing argument over the consequences of their ill defined relationship break (https://me.me/t/we-were-on-a-break?since=1448373424%2C9020939)RELATIONSHIPS - FRIENDS - ON A BREAK

If you take a break from the relationship – whatever you tell each other or agree – that relationship has been, effectively, broken and will need rebuilding if it is resumed. (The only kind of exception I can think of would be if you behave as if you are still in the relationship whilst on the break. So why bother to take a break, unless it’s just a break from each other’s constant company that is arranged.)

Finally I feel sure that unless you agree what a break means to you both (what behaviours are okay, how available you will be to each other and when the break will be over etc) you’re potentially in for a world of trouble after the break, if not an acknowledgement that this is really a break up!

Below: It’s not uncommon for a couple to break up, remember why they were attracted to each other, get back together then, quite quickly, remember why they separated

 

Alison

My Tribe – Being Different & Belonging

I’ve been watching ‘Needles & Pins’ a documentary series about those who like to assert their difference by tattooing and modifying their bodies. The result of these changes seems to be people who can only really feel at home in this very unusual tribe of similarly altered people.

Why do they do it? Really?

It’s a very interesting phenomenon. We all need to belong, but there are always those people who feel the need to assert their individuality by how they look. Within a ‘tribe’ I see it as an escalation of differences developed because of comparison. ‘If you can do that then I can do this…. “ and so the modifications become ever more extreme, as comparisons are made between those who have already left ‘normal’ far behind. I expect that’s why they embrace personal modifications that are very disturbing to most of us. There’s also the need to be different, even within this extreme group.

Below are some examples of piercings, tattoos, stretchers and dermal inserts chosen by those who want to stand out in a crowd.  Some can still be concealed, but most of these changes firmly set their owners apart from the everyday person. They also require quite a high level of commitment in terms of time, money and pain.

Below: Skull Dermals (https://au.pinterest.com/pin/276549233343786627/)

MODIFIED w SKULL HANDS.jpg

Below: Permanent Zips and Laces (http://beautystories101.blogspot.com.au/2012_01_01_archive.html)

Below: Changing Faces & Other things –  Left: (https://au.pinterest.com/imdebbiej/how-bizzare/) Right: (http://www.oddee.com/item_96602.aspx)

 

(http://www.oddee.com/item_97759.aspx)

MODIFIED - SYRINGE MAN

Of course some don’t want to commit to their tribe so completely and achieve their sense of difference through makeup, clothing and attitude.

Below: All dressed up and Chores to do (https://au.pinterest.com/rhubarb1951/people-of-walmart/?lp=true)

I think some alter them selves so they don’t have to compete in the difficult world of socially acceptable beauty. They remove themselves from this socially conventional area of competition, even if they are entering another one. Personally I hope whatever changes the more extreme modifiers feel called on to make has no long term detrimental consequences and meets their own needs.

 

Alison

 

 

Parenting Adult Children

As children mature into adults it becomes increasingly clear that a lot of their behaviours are fixed, and some of these behaviours are less than ideal.  Unfortunately our adult children are unlikely to ‘grow out of it’ and it’s not a ‘phase’ they’re going through.

When I look back at the more troublesome behaviours I helped to fix in my own child I realise I’m still encouraging some of those behaviours. Talking to friends made it clear that I was not alone. In fact it’s very common for parents to continue to interact with their adult children in pretty much the same way they did when they were both younger. It’s partly because many of us haven’t markedly changed how we think about our children.

A common issue for ‘Baby Boomer’ parents is the tendency to over rescue their children. We rescue them from the consequences of their own behaviour so they don’t really have to learn to deal with these consequences themselves. We hope that by ‘fixing’ their problems our children will learn from our example; because of course we talk, endlessly, to them about what we’re doing and what they should do. This is despite all the evidence that what is really happening is that they have learned to rely on us rescuing them and fixing everything. Listening (or pretending to listen) to our advice being the price they have to pay for this help.

PARENTING ADULT CHILD - THEIR KIDS.jpg

It’s common for us to assist our adult children with money matters in particular. We lend money, without interest, and often on a very elastic system for repayment. In many instances the borrowers know it only needs to be repaid if a big fuss is made over the money.

So why is this a problem? Well two things spring instantly to mind. Firstly we won’t be there forever to rescue our babies. Our adult children need to learn how to change their behaviours so they can become fully functioning adults.  For example they should be able to manage their own money effectively.

PARENTING ADULT CHILD - THERAPY.jpg

Secondly we aren’t the only people our children will have family relationships with. Our adult children have to respect their obligations to family and to understand that a commitment to family is important and needs to be followed through. Interestingly they often understand that these things are important in relation to strangers, but fail where family are concerned.

Realigning family relationships as children move through the process of growing up requires quite a lot of work. Parenting relationships with children need to be redefined and renegotiated again and again. We need to recognise our children’s increasing need for independence. The support we provide should increasingly allow our maturing children to take more and more control of their own lives. Hopefully as parents we change and grow too, assisting us to meet this challenge.

I often think about the importance of taking the long term view when parenting. I mean it’s important to think about what’s best in the long term rather than what’s easiest now. I’m not saying we must be conscious and do the ‘right’ thing every time, but if we could be mostly consistent. If we could be conscious of both our long term relationships with our children and their relationships to the rest of the world ….. wouldn’t it be better for our adult children and for us?

 

Alison

PARENTING ADULT CHILD - INTERVIEW.jpg